Minolta SCAN DUAL IV or canon 9950f?
PC Hardware Forum Index PC Hardware
Dicussion of PC hardware and peripherals
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web hwtalk.net
Minolta SCAN DUAL IV or canon 9950f?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PC Hardware Forum Index -> Scanners
Author Message
Lotas
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 2:18 pm    Post subject: Minolta SCAN DUAL IV or canon 9950f? Reply with quote

Hi

I want to scan quite a lot of 35mm negative rolls - some of them more
than 15 years old - and regarding my somewhat limited budget, and the
scanner models available where i live, i have the following options:

- Canon 9950f. Fare Level 3, scans printed materials, good negative
scanning for a flatbed.

- Minolta Scan IV. Higher DPI, higher dmax, much sharper scans than any
flatbed but *no ICE nor FARE*

I would pick the minolta, however, i've read that the lack of hardware
dust & scratch correction causes negatives that have been less than
perfectly stored to produce almost unusable scans.

Being the case that many of the negative rolls i plan to scan where
thrown into envelopes with little care... should i forget about the
minolta?

regards
Back to top
CSM1
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Minolta SCAN DUAL IV or canon 9950f? Reply with quote

"Lotas" <100013790@alumnos.uc3m.es> wrote in message
news:1102670317.500065.321230@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Hi

I want to scan quite a lot of 35mm negative rolls - some of them more
than 15 years old - and regarding my somewhat limited budget, and the
scanner models available where i live, i have the following options:

- Canon 9950f. Fare Level 3, scans printed materials, good negative
scanning for a flatbed.

- Minolta Scan IV. Higher DPI, higher dmax, much sharper scans than any
flatbed but *no ICE nor FARE*

I would pick the minolta, however, i've read that the lack of hardware
dust & scratch correction causes negatives that have been less than
perfectly stored to produce almost unusable scans.

Being the case that many of the negative rolls i plan to scan where
thrown into envelopes with little care... should i forget about the
minolta?

regards

I would say, find a friend or co-worker that has a Minolta Scan Dual IV and

take some of your negatives and see how bad it is.

Negatives in an envelope that have not be handled very much will be in
better shape than you may think. What harms negatives is the handling and
being exposed to sunlight and dust.

If the negatives were not in envelopes, you would have a big problem.

Cleaning with a Static brush and PEC-12 and air will give amazing results if
the negatives are not scratched up.

PEC-12
http://www.photosol.com/

PEC-12 and Static brushes can be found at Photo Supply stores, and Adorama.
http://www.adorama.com

B&H will not ship chemicals.

I use Kinetronics StaticWisk Model SW-030 for my static brush.
I own a Minolta Scan Dual IV. For the money it does a great job. It would be
nice it the ScanDual 4 had ICE, buy it is not necessary.

--
CSM1
http://www.carlmcmillan.com
--
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PC Hardware Forum Index -> Scanners All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Electronics VoIP DSP
New Topics php BB