| Author |
Message |
zakezuke
Guest
|
 Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:47 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
| Quote: | I was particularly annoyed, however, that he attacked someone who, with
English as a second language, still makes himself well understood in
participating in the NG. His mocking comments were beyond rude.
|
What's JR's 1st language? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:59 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
Burt wrote:
| Quote: | Steve - I have him killfiled and don't see any of his posts first hand. I
agree 100% with you. I never read his garbage and have no interest in
responding to him.
THIS MAN LIES. HE ALWAYS MANAGES TO FIND A WAY EITHER DIRECTLY, |
INDIRECTLY, OR WITH AN INUENDO TO RESPOND. MY NAME AND MY TRUTHS ARE
ALWAYS ON THE TIP OF HIS TONGUE. TRY AS HE MIGHT OVER A REASONALBE
AMOUNT OF TIME THE GUY (AND HIS BUDDIES) JUST CANNOT RESIST.
| Quote: | I was particularly annoyed, however, that he attacked someone who, with
English as a second language, still makes himself well understood in
participating in the NG. His mocking comments were beyond rude.
KILLFILED HUG |
HE GETS MY MESSAGE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
| Quote: | I'd be glad to see everyone killfile him and not respond.
BUT THEY DO |
BUT YOU DO
BUT YOU JUST DID
| Quote: | "Steve Lee" <stevelee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Me6df.16071$Zv5.1285@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
Tony wrote:
Quite right Burt.
Tony
Tony, Burt:
I am not against anyone. But I do find (almost always with no exception)
that MK's posts are not worth any time to even read them.
So instead of posting replies against his why not just ignore them? No, I
am
not saying to ignore them. I am saying don't bother to read any of them.
I am sure most people on this NG do not read anything with MK as the
sender's
name. Let him enjoy the fun being a unpopular figure on this NG, if that's
fun to him. That's his own business and we should all leave him alone.
Honestly he did make some points sometimes. But he seems enjoy making
nonsense
more than making sense. I have long stopped reading anything he posted.
Steve
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Burt
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:41 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
I don't know. It seemed obvious that his command of English was more than
adequate to be understood but most probably not his native language. Of
course I could be mistaken. Nonetheless, if you make the assumption that
English is his first language it is still inappropriate to mock him (her?)
for English errors.
"zakezuke" <zakezuke_us@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131738464.681022.143260@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | I was particularly annoyed, however, that he attacked someone who, with
English as a second language, still makes himself well understood in
participating in the NG. His mocking comments were beyond rude.
What's JR's 1st language?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:48 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
Burt wrote:
| Quote: | I don't know. It seemed obvious that his command of English
YOU CAN BE COUNTED ON |
| Quote: | was more than
adequate to be understood but most probably not his native language. Of
course I could be mistaken.
THAT HAPPENS |
| Quote: | Nonetheless, if you make the assumption that
English is his first language it is still inappropriate to mock him (her?)
for English errors.
"zakezuke" <zakezuke_us@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131738464.681022.143260@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I was particularly annoyed, however, that he attacked someone who, with
English as a second language, still makes himself well understood in
participating in the NG. His mocking comments were beyond rude.
What's JR's 1st language?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zakezuke
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:09 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
| Quote: | It seemed obvious that his command of English was more than
adequate to be understood but most probably not his native language. Of
course I could be mistaken.
|
You're likely correct, JR said "gamacu malaka" which is really close to
"Gamata malaka". Malaka is a town in Malaysia but in Sinhala I believe
it would be something to the effect of Full wanker... or outstanding
wanker... something like that. I don't have a Sinhala dictionary handy
assuming this is Sinhala, but I think outstanding wanker is the
intended meaning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:36 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
VALHALLA OR CHALLA
zakezuke wrote:
| Quote: | It seemed obvious that his command of English was more than
adequate to be understood but most probably not his native language. Of
course I could be mistaken.
You're likely correct, JR said "gamacu malaka" which is really close to
"Gamata malaka". Malaka is a town in Malaysia but in Sinhala I believe
it would be something to the effect of Full wanker... or outstanding
wanker... something like that. I don't have a Sinhala dictionary handy
assuming this is Sinhala, but I think outstanding wanker is the
intended meaning.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tony
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 6:22 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
Steve Lee <stevelee@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Tony wrote:
Quite right Burt.
Tony
Tony, Burt:
I am not against anyone. But I do find (almost always with no exception)
that MK's posts are not worth any time to even read them.
So instead of posting replies against his why not just ignore them? No, I am
not saying to ignore them. I am saying don't bother to read any of them.
I am sure most people on this NG do not read anything with MK as the sender's
name. Let him enjoy the fun being a unpopular figure on this NG, if that's
fun to him. That's his own business and we should all leave him alone.
Honestly he did make some points sometimes. But he seems enjoy making nonsense
more than making sense. I have long stopped reading anything he posted.
Steve
|
Steve
There is nothing you have said that I could disagree with.
The only concern I have is that from time to time a new person comes here with
an innocent question often out of frustration after many hours fighting a
problem and Measekite will often reply with a one line rude and dismissive
comment. He blames some mythical person for this because they supposedly
offended him in the past and therefore it is OK for him to be offensive to some
newcomer. You know the attitude, "I had a bad upbringing so it's not my fault".
If these new posters receive a Measekite blast they may simply go away and
dismiss this forum and that would be a shame. I accept that the regulars here
have already established the truth, it is only the newcomers that I am
concerned with.
Anyway, I understand and respect your opinion.
Tony |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:12 pm Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
Tony wrote:
| Quote: | Steve Lee <stevelee@hotmail.com> wrote:
Tony wrote:
Quite right Burt.
Tony
Tony, Burt:
I am not against anyone. But I do find (almost always with no exception)
that MK's posts are not worth any time to even read them.
So instead of posting replies against his why not just ignore them? No, I am
not saying to ignore them. I am saying don't bother to read any of them.
I am sure most people on this NG do not read anything with MK as the sender's
name. Let him enjoy the fun being a unpopular figure on this NG, if that's
fun to him. That's his own business and we should all leave him alone.
Honestly he did make some points sometimes. But he seems enjoy making nonsense
more than making sense. I have long stopped reading anything he posted.
Steve
Steve
There is nothing you have said that I could disagree with.
The only concern I have is that from time to time a new person comes here with
an innocent question often out of frustration after many hours fighting a
problem and Measekite will often reply with a one line rude and dismissive
comment.
MEASEKITE WILL TELL THEM THE TRUTH AND YALL GO INTO A TIZZY |
| Quote: | He blames some mythical person for this because they supposedly
offended him in the past and therefore it is OK for him to be offensive to some
newcomer. You know the attitude, "I had a bad upbringing so it's not my fault".
If these new posters receive a Measekite blast
TONY ONLY SAYS THAT BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN EXPOSED. HE IS IN THE PRINTER |
BUSINESS AND MAKES MONEY FROM THIS. HE DOES NOT LIKE PEOPLE TO KNOW
THIS. WHEN HE IS EXPOSED HE WILL THEN ADMIT IT BUT DENY HE MAKES ANY
MONEY DUE TO HIS PUBLIC RELATIONS IN THE NG.
| Quote: | they may simply go away and
dismiss this forum and that would be a shame. I accept that the
regulars
THESE ARE THE PEOPLE A NEWCOMER SHOULD BE WEARY OF. THEY GIVE THEM THE |
WRONG ADVICE.
| Quote: | here
have already established the truth, it is only the newcomers that I am
concerned with.
Anyway, I understand and respect your opinion.
Tony
YOU CAN ALWQAYS COUNT ON AN ANSER FROM ONE OF THE REGULARS. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zakezuke
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:12 pm Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
| Quote: | The only concern I have is that from time to time a new person comes here with
an innocent question often out of frustration after many hours fighting a
problem and Measekite will often reply with a one line rude and dismissive
comment.
|
Or worse yet... make some sort of claim he's telling people *da truth*,
which is funny as it's relativly easy to goggle him and establish the
fact that he lies... alot. But you have to admit... the average child
can figure out the gent has no clue what he's talking about most of the
time. The few times he has useful info are sort of lost in his flood
of spam.
What's sad is i'm all for having a pro OEM user in this group...
someone who has experence with OEM solutions vs some aftermarket... who
made the choice to to go OEM and establish their reasons so someone
with no experence can make a valued judgement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:44 pm Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
zakezuke wrote:
| Quote: | The only concern I have is that from time to time a new person comes here with
an innocent question often out of frustration after many hours fighting a
problem and Measekite will often reply with a one line rude and dismissive
comment.
Or worse yet... make some sort of claim he's telling people *da truth*,
which is funny as it's relativly easy to goggle him and establish the
fact that he lies... alot.
YOU SHOULD TELL THE TRUTH MORE OFTEN BUT BE CONCISE. YOU ARE MUCH TOO |
LONG EINDED AND I AM SURE THAT OTHERS LIKE MYSELF DO NOT READ MOST OF
WHAT YOU WRITE.
| Quote: | But you have to admit... the average child
can figure out the gent has no clue what he's talking about most of the
time. The few times he has useful info are sort of lost in his flood
of spam.
What's sad is i'm all for having a pro OEM user in this group...
someone who has experence with OEM solutions vs some aftermarket... who
made the choice to to go OEM and establish their reasons so someone
with no experence can make a valued judgement.
NOW UR TALKEN |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tony
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:42 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
"zakezuke" <zakezuke_us@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | The only concern I have is that from time to time a new person comes here
with
an innocent question often out of frustration after many hours fighting a
problem and Measekite will often reply with a one line rude and dismissive
comment.
Or worse yet... make some sort of claim he's telling people *da truth*,
which is funny as it's relativly easy to goggle him and establish the
fact that he lies... alot. But you have to admit... the average child
can figure out the gent has no clue what he's talking about most of the
time. The few times he has useful info are sort of lost in his flood
of spam.
What's sad is i'm all for having a pro OEM user in this group...
someone who has experence with OEM solutions vs some aftermarket... who
made the choice to to go OEM and establish their reasons so someone
with no experence can make a valued judgement.
|
Wouldn't that be good? I have many customers who choose OEM cartridges and many
who do not, we sell both which is exactly what a balanced person would expect.
We make no attempt to persuade our customers either way, we simply answer
questions if they ask.
Tony |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zakezuke
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:17 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
| Quote: | We make no attempt to persuade our customers either way, we simply answer
questions if they ask.
|
Yea... it's just like a friend asked me the other day.
q: Do these inks clog my printer
a: With the stuff I use I had to do a deep cleaning once in the past 6
months... thought I had a problem on another printer but turns out the
board was fubar
q: Are they as good as canon
a: The stuff I use... nope... According to what i've seen they are not
as lightfast. Color though it pretty pretty good. The bci-3e black is
really good and a very decent value worth considering paying extra for
as it seems to dry a wee bit faster doesn't seem to leave an odd puddle
on the paper. The real question is if it's worth spending $3000/gal
for this stuff or 90% less if you buy by the ounce for this other stuff
that works pretty well.
I think that's pretty balanced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:10 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
zakezuke wrote:
| Quote: | We make no attempt to persuade our customers either way, we simply answer
questions if they ask.
Yea... it's just like a friend asked me the other day.
q: Do these inks clog my printer
a: With the stuff I use I had to do a deep cleaning once in the past 6
months... thought I had a problem on another printer but turns out the
board was fubar
q: Are they as good as canon
a: The stuff I use... nope... According to what i've seen they are not
as lightfast. Color though it pretty pretty good. The bci-3e black is
really good and a very decent value worth considering paying extra for
as it seems to dry a wee bit faster doesn't seem to leave an odd puddle
on the paper. The real question is if it's worth spending $3000/gal
for this stuff or 90% less if you buy by the ounce for this other stuff
that works pretty well.
I think that's pretty balanced.
|
UNLESS YOU ARE A HIGH PRINT USER IT IS NOT WORTH IT TO USE AFTERMARKET
INKS. YOU ARE PUTTING YOUR PRINTER AT HIGHER RISK FOR A PRINTCLOG , THE
RESULTS ARE NOT AS STUNNING, THERE ARE NO PROFILES FOR WHO KNOWS WHAT
INK YOU ARE REALLY USING, AND MOST HAVE A HIGHER TENDANCY TO FADE.
HOWEVER, IF YOU ARE A VERY HIGH USER AND DO NOT SELL YOUR STUFF (YOU
JUST REPRINT AS NECESSARY) THEN IT MAY BE REASONABLE TO TRY THE ONLY
BRAND OF AFTERMARKET INKS I KNOW OF THAT IS SOLD IN PREFILLED CARTS BY
ONLY ONE PLACE ON THE WEB.
AND THERE WAS TROUBLE WITH MAGENTA DURING THE SUMMER FROM THAT BRAND.
APPARENTLY THEY CHANGED THE FORMULAE AND DID NOT THOUGHLY TEST IT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:14 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
Tony wrote:
| Quote: | "zakezuke" <zakezuke_us@yahoo.com> wrote:
The only concern I have is that from time to time a new person comes here
with
an innocent question often out of frustration after many hours fighting a
problem and Measekite will often reply with a one line rude and dismissive
comment.
Or worse yet... make some sort of claim he's telling people *da truth*,
which is funny as it's relativly easy to goggle him and establish the
fact that he lies... alot. But you have to admit... the average child
can figure out the gent has no clue what he's talking about most of the
time. The few times he has useful info are sort of lost in his flood
of spam.
What's sad is i'm all for having a pro OEM user in this group...
someone who has experence with OEM solutions vs some aftermarket... who
made the choice to to go OEM and establish their reasons so someone
with no experence can make a valued judgement.
Wouldn't that be good? I have many customers who choose OEM cartridges and many
who do not,
we sell both which is exactly what a balanced person would expect.
*NOT ONLY IS TONY IN DA PRINTER BUSINESS BUT |
HE SELLS AFTERMARKET INK.
WHO ELSE IN THIS NG IS IN THE BUSINESS. MAYBE IT IS ALL OF THE REGULARS.*
| Quote: | We make no attempt to persuade our customers either way, we simply answer
questions if they ask.
Tony
OH YEAH, YOU ARE A SAINT JUST LIKE ALL OF THE POLITICIANS |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tony
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:17 am Post subject:
Re: canon 530D |
|
|
"zakezuke" <zakezuke_us@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | We make no attempt to persuade our customers either way, we simply answer
questions if they ask.
Yea... it's just like a friend asked me the other day.
q: Do these inks clog my printer
a: With the stuff I use I had to do a deep cleaning once in the past 6
months... thought I had a problem on another printer but turns out the
board was fubar
q: Are they as good as canon
a: The stuff I use... nope... According to what i've seen they are not
as lightfast. Color though it pretty pretty good. The bci-3e black is
really good and a very decent value worth considering paying extra for
as it seems to dry a wee bit faster doesn't seem to leave an odd puddle
on the paper. The real question is if it's worth spending $3000/gal
for this stuff or 90% less if you buy by the ounce for this other stuff
that works pretty well.
I think that's pretty balanced.
|
So do I. Pity that "balanced" is so often in short supply!
Tony |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in