| Author |
Message |
Alan Justice
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:14 pm Post subject:
2200 equivalent |
|
|
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davy
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:32 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
I know the feeling, my printers where at the opposite end of the
price scale, I was so sick of Epson clogging I was hell bent on
trying a Canon. I took the bait and got a ip5000 and over 4 months
now not one single clog nor manual head clean required to date.
The C62 clogged on the 4th day, it was exchanged somewhile later and
that clogged on the 4th day all with Epson ink, Epson would not
transfer the warranty, I believe now that it was a refurbished unit.
The ip5000 is far more economical, uses clear ink tanks and they'er
not chipped, I understand the newer ones are, I imagine you'll be
looking at the higher end printers, which I will leave for other
people to answer.
Davy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:48 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
Alan Justice wrote:
| Quote: | My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
Sorry but even though I have a Canon i9900 for the purposes you state I |
would recommend the new Espon 2400.
Frank |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jon O'Brien
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:19 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
In article <iAraf.5275$yX2.2902@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
spam@spamspamspam.spam (Alan Justice) wrote:
| Quote: | If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with?
|
Suggest you check back through the newsgroup for previous postings from
the poster with the stuck caps lock key. Then you can decide for yourself
whether or not to consider his advice.
Jon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yianni
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:26 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
The 2400 is the direct equivalent. The 1800 is also another choice.
--
Yianni
in@mailbox9.gr (remove number nine to reply)
--
"Alan Justice" <spam@spamspamspam.spam> wrote in message
news:iAraf.5275$yX2.2902@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| Quote: |
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson
replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides suggestions,
I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and
evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
measekite
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:46 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
CANON I9900 USING CANON OEM INK. FRAME IT UNDER GLASS
Alan Justice wrote:
| Quote: | My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
measekite
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:50 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
Davy wrote:
| Quote: | I know the feeling, my printers where at the opposite end of the
price scale, I was so sick of Epson clogging I was hell bent on
trying a Canon. I took the bait and got a ip5000 and over 4 months
now not one single clog nor manual head clean required to date.
I BELIEVE YOU ARE USING CANON OEM INK. IF NOT YOU CAN EXPECT A CLOG. |
BESIDES TO GO 13X19 HE NEEDS AN I9900
| Quote: | The C62 clogged on the 4th day, it was exchanged somewhile later and
that clogged on the 4th day all with Epson ink, Epson would not
transfer the warranty, I believe now that it was a refurbished unit.
The ip5000 is far more economical, uses clear ink tanks and they'er
not chipped, I understand the newer ones are, I imagine you'll be
looking at the higher end printers, which I will leave for other
people to answer.
Davy
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
measekite
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:51 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
Frank wrote:
| Quote: | Alan Justice wrote:
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson
replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement
also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working
printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high
quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides
suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and
evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
Sorry but even though I have a Canon i9900 for the purposes you state
I would recommend the new Espon 2400.
Frank
|
DO NOT LISTEN TO HIM. THE I9900 CANON WITH CANON INK IS THE ONLY WAY TO
GO. PIGMENTED INK PRINTERS HAVE A GREATER TENDENCY TO CLOG THE HEAD
EVEN WITH OEM INK AND YOU CAN TOTALLY FORGET AFTERMARKET UNBRANDED
GENERIC INK. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:31 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
Yianni wrote:
| Quote: | The 2400 is the direct equivalent. The 1800 is also another choice.
--
Yianni
in@mailbox9.gr (remove number nine to reply)
--
"Alan Justice" <spam@spamspamspam.spam> wrote in message
news:iAraf.5275$yX2.2902@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson
replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides suggestions,
I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and
evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
The best prints will come from the Epson 2400 not the Canon i9900. |
Frank |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frederick
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:48 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
Alan Justice wrote:
| Quote: | My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
Reviews on Canon 9900 / 9950, HP 8750, Epson 1800/2400 A3+ printers are |
here:
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/
The HP and Canon will provide archival quality - but on swellable
polymer papers - IMO not suitable for sale unframed. They will both
print nicely on "fast dry" papers, but the prints won't be archival.
Head clogging seems not to be much of an issue with the R1800/2400 using
OEM cartridges. Beware counterfeit cartridges - there is a thread on
that subject in the photo-i forums. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
measekite
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:25 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
Frank wrote:
| Quote: | Yianni wrote:
The 2400 is the direct equivalent. The 1800 is also another choice.
--
Yianni
in@mailbox9.gr (remove number nine to reply)
--
"Alan Justice" <spam@spamspamspam.spam> wrote in message
news:iAraf.5275$yX2.2902@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson
replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement
also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working
printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high
quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides
suggestions,
I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and
evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
The best prints will come from the Epson 2400 not the Canon i9900.
Frank
|
The best prints will come from the Canon i9900. Editors choice PCMag.
Who are you going to trust? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
measekite
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:25 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
Jon O'Brien wrote:
| Quote: | In article <iAraf.5275$yX2.2902@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
spam@spamspamspam.spam (Alan Justice) wrote:
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with?
Suggest you check back through the newsgroup for previous postings from
the poster with the stuck caps lock key. Then you can decide for yourself
whether or not to consider his advice.
Jon.
|
I WILL DO THAT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Justice
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:34 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
"Frank" <fb@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:sXsaf.65448$WR2.41951@fed1read03...
| Quote: | Alan Justice wrote:
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson
replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement
also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working
printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high
quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides
suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and
evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
Sorry but even though I have a Canon i9900 for the purposes you state I
would recommend the new Espon 2400.
Frank
|
Could you elaborate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Justice
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:36 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:noxaf.23808$6e1.8533@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
| Quote: |
Frank wrote:
Alan Justice wrote:
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson
replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement
also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working
printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high
quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides
suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and
evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
Sorry but even though I have a Canon i9900 for the purposes you state
I would recommend the new Espon 2400.
Frank
DO NOT LISTEN TO HIM. THE I9900 CANON WITH CANON INK IS THE ONLY WAY TO
GO. PIGMENTED INK PRINTERS HAVE A GREATER TENDENCY TO CLOG THE HEAD
EVEN WITH OEM INK AND YOU CAN TOTALLY FORGET AFTERMARKET UNBRANDED
GENERIC INK.
|
Could you give me a reference to support that? Do you agree with
frederick's statement about the swellable polymer paper (??) being archival,
but not good for selling unmounted photos?
--
- Alan Justice |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Justice
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:45 am Post subject:
Re: 2200 equivalent |
|
|
"frederick" <lost@sea.com> wrote in message
news:1131065205.765369@ftpsrv1...
| Quote: | Alan Justice wrote:
My Epson 2200 stopped working just as the warranty ran out. Epson
replaced
it under warranty (refurbished, I assume), but it had problems. They
replaced it with one that did not work at all. The next replacement
also
has some problems we are working on. I'm spending way too much time on
this, and am not optimistic that they will ever send me a working
printer.
If I give up on Epson, what should I replace it with? I need high
quality
glossies (for sale), archival, and at least 13x19". Besides
suggestions, I
would also appreciate a web site that gives the comparisons and
evaluations.
Thanks.
--
- Alan Justice
Reviews on Canon 9900 / 9950, HP 8750, Epson 1800/2400 A3+ printers are
here:
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/
The HP and Canon will provide archival quality - but on swellable
polymer papers - IMO not suitable for sale unframed. They will both
print nicely on "fast dry" papers, but the prints won't be archival.
Head clogging seems not to be much of an issue with the R1800/2400 using
OEM cartridges. Beware counterfeit cartridges - there is a thread on
that subject in the photo-i forums.
|
Thanks for the link. I'll study it. What is "swellable polymer?" I do
sell some unmounted photos. All must be high quality and archival. I've
been using Epson Glossy Photo Paper with nice results. It sounds like you
think there is nothing as good as the Epson.
Epson is about to send me my 4th replacement printer. With a 1-day
warranty.
--
- Alan Justice |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|