| Author |
Message |
measekite
Guest
|
 Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:25 am Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
drc023 wrote:
| Quote: | Frank,
How about not replying to his inane drivel unless you have something to say
which is directly related to the thread.
HE CANNOT HELP HIMSELF |
| Quote: | We all know that he is what you
describe, so there is no reason to further pollute the bandwidth. He is
desperately seeking any kind of attention that he can get. The poor soul
needs our pity along with some serious psychological counseling.
|
CANON PRINTERS ARE MOST LIKEELEE DA BEST DEEL IF YOU USE OEM INK. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
drc023
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:25 am Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
Frank,
How about not replying to his inane drivel unless you have something to say
which is directly related to the thread. We all know that he is what you
describe, so there is no reason to further pollute the bandwidth. He is
desperately seeking any kind of attention that he can get. The poor soul
needs our pity along with some serious psychological counseling.
--
Ron
"Frank" <fb@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:tZ8af.65325$WR2.54670@fed1read03...
| Quote: | ian lincoln wrote:
"Frank" <fb@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:lt7af.65321$WR2.11771@fed1read03...
Not to worry zz...meashershithead is the only person who believes the
lies that spew from his mouth.
Frank
For fucks sake stop replying to him. I read through half the posts the
first time i logged on to this group and sussed him straight away. The
only time i see this drivel is when someone else quotes him. So if you
must reply please remove his original response.
Sorry, but I'm not answering that moron fuckwit asshole. I too have him
kill filed. The only time I see his stupid ass is when someone else has
responded to his bullshit.
Frank |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drc023
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:25 am Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
| Quote: |
While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is not
necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If your print
cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the first time, but may
refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and ages. Using remanufacturered
and off-brand cartridges is also chancy. They may leak causing print head
damage. If your printer is old or you only paid $30 for it, the cost
savings may be worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for your printer, you
may want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the manufacturer.
|
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid points. I may
not necessarily agree with your position, but that's not a problem for me.
If you would continue with these kinds of replies and discontinue the
abusive behavior you might actually get a few people to respond to you in a
positive way.
--
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frank
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:25 am Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
drc023 wrote:
| Quote: | While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is not
necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If your print
cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the first time, but may
refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and ages. Using remanufacturered
and off-brand cartridges is also chancy. They may leak causing print head
damage. If your printer is old or you only paid $30 for it, the cost
savings may be worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for your printer, you
may want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the manufacturer.
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid points. I may
not necessarily agree with your position, but that's not a problem for me.
If you would continue with these kinds of replies and discontinue the
abusive behavior you might actually get a few people to respond to you in a
positive way.
--
Ron
Uhhh...It's rather obvious that meashershithead plagiarized this small |
article either from a magazine (most likely) or from some other poster
in some other forum. Either way, I'm pretty sure it is plagiarized and
is in fact a copyright violation. It's simply not his style...or rather
it is his style of thievery but not his style of writing.
If you know what I mean.
Frank |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drc023
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:36 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
Guess what Frank - YOU ARE CORRECT. The comments are plagiarized. Copy the
first sentence and paste it into a Google search bar. It brings up an
article in an AARP newsletter. See the eighth paragraph down. This is a link
to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
Looks like our pitiful little friend just isn't very honest.
--
Ron
<snipped>
| Quote: |
Uhhh...It's rather obvious that meashershithead plagiarized this small
article either from a magazine (most likely) or from some other poster in
some other forum. Either way, I'm pretty sure it is plagiarized and is in
fact a copyright violation. It's simply not his style...or rather it is
his style of thievery but not his style of writing.
If you know what I mean.
Frank |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tony
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:47 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
"drc023" <d+r+c+0+2+3@sbcXXXglobalYYY.ZZZnet> wrote:
| Quote: | Guess what Frank - YOU ARE CORRECT. The comments are plagiarized. Copy the
first sentence and paste it into a Google search bar. It brings up an
article in an AARP newsletter. See the eighth paragraph down. This is a link
to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
Looks like our pitiful little friend just isn't very honest.
--
Ron
snipped
Uhhh...It's rather obvious that meashershithead plagiarized this small
article either from a magazine (most likely) or from some other poster in
some other forum. Either way, I'm pretty sure it is plagiarized and is in
fact a copyright violation. It's simply not his style...or rather it is
his style of thievery but not his style of writing.
If you know what I mean.
Frank
|
Bugger
When I saw this I thought maybe he has some ability to debate and can come up
with some cogent argument....but no, just more stolen ideas.
Ah well, back to the drawing board.
Tony |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drc023
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:55 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:fljaf.12009$dO2.437@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
| Quote: |
drc023 wrote:
While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is not
necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If your print
cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the first time, but may
refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and ages. Using
remanufacturered and off-brand cartridges is also chancy. They may leak
causing print head damage. If your printer is old or you only paid $30
for it, the cost savings may be worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for
your printer, you may want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the
manufacturer.
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid points. I
may not necessarily agree with your position, but that's not a problem for
me. If you would continue with these kinds of replies and discontinue the
abusive behavior you might actually get a few people to respond to you in
a positive way.
--
Ron
DANK U
|
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote the
response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of your
statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an AARP
newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its entirety with no
credit given to the author. That is known as plagiarism and copyright
infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frank
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:03 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
drc023 wrote:
| Quote: |
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote the
response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of your
statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an AARP
newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its entirety with no
credit given to the author. That is known as plagiarism and copyright
infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron
|
You don't actually think our resident idiot could come up with some
thong like this on his own do you?
He's a thief and he proves it on a daily basis. What he did (copyright
infringement) is legally actionable if anyone wanted to pursue it. At
least his ISP should know what he is doing and has done.
Frank |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
IN DA BUSINESS
Tony wrote:
| Quote: | "drc023" <d+r+c+0+2+3@sbcXXXglobalYYY.ZZZnet> wrote:
Guess what Frank - YOU ARE CORRECT. The comments are plagiarized. Copy the
first sentence and paste it into a Google search bar. It brings up an
article in an AARP newsletter. See the eighth paragraph down. This is a link
to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
Looks like our pitiful little friend just isn't very honest.
--
Ron
snipped
Uhhh...It's rather obvious that meashershithead plagiarized this small
article either from a magazine (most likely) or from some other poster in
some other forum. Either way, I'm pretty sure it is plagiarized and is in
fact a copyright violation. It's simply not his style...or rather it is
his style of thievery but not his style of writing.
If you know what I mean.
Frank
Bugger
When I saw this I thought maybe he has some ability to debate and can come up
with some cogent argument....but no, just more stolen ideas.
Ah well, back to the drawing board.
Tony
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
DANKIE WANKIE
drc023 wrote:
| Quote: | "measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:fljaf.12009$dO2.437@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
drc023 wrote:
While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is not
necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If your print
cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the first time, but may
refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and ages. Using
remanufacturered and off-brand cartridges is also chancy. They may leak
causing print head damage. If your printer is old or you only paid $30
for it, the cost savings may be worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for
your printer, you may want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the
manufacturer.
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid points. I
may not necessarily agree with your position, but that's not a problem for
me. If you would continue with these kinds of replies and discontinue the
abusive behavior you might actually get a few people to respond to you in
a positive way.
--
Ron
DANK U
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote the
response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of your
statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an AARP
newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its entirety with no
credit given to the author. That is known as plagiarism and copyright
infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:12 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
Frank wrote:
| Quote: | drc023 wrote:
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote
the response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of
your statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an
AARP newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its entirety
with no credit given to the author. That is known as plagiarism and
copyright infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron
You don't actually think our resident idiot
|
NAME CALLER
| Quote: | could come up with some thong like this on his own do you?
He's a thief
|
ACCUSER
| Quote: | and he proves it on a daily basis. What he did (copyright
infringement) is legally actionable if anyone wanted to pursue it. At
least his ISP should know what he is doing and has done.
Frank |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Burt
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:26 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
"drc023" <d+r+c+0+2+3@sbcXXXglobalYYY.ZZZnet> wrote in message
news:8gkaf.9346$7h7.1565@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
| Quote: |
"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:fljaf.12009$dO2.437@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
drc023 wrote:
While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is not
necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If your print
cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the first time, but may
refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and ages. Using
remanufacturered and off-brand cartridges is also chancy. They may leak
causing print head damage. If your printer is old or you only paid $30
for it, the cost savings may be worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for
your printer, you may want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the
manufacturer.
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid points. I
may not necessarily agree with your position, but that's not a problem
for me. If you would continue with these kinds of replies and discontinue
the abusive behavior you might actually get a few people to respond to
you in a positive way.
--
Ron
DANK U
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote the
response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of your
statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an AARP
newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its entirety with no
credit given to the author. That is known as plagiarism and copyright
infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron
|
I just returned from six weeks out of town and see that MK (I have him
killfiled, but see parts of his misinformation in other participants' posts)
is still up to his old, old nonsense. I emphasize OLD - I had always
assumed that he was a juvenile deliquent, especially because part of his
attacks on me referenced my senior status. I now see that he reads AARP
material, and I have to revise my opinion of him - he must be the most
immature, profanity-obscessed, obnoxious, attention-seeking resident in an
old folks home. I should have known as his writing style, poor spelling and
syntax, smack of advanced dementia. Pity the other residents who have to
confront him daily. At least we can killfile him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frank
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:39 pm Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
Burt wrote:
| Quote: | "drc023" <d+r+c+0+2+3@sbcXXXglobalYYY.ZZZnet> wrote in message
news:8gkaf.9346$7h7.1565@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:fljaf.12009$dO2.437@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
drc023 wrote:
While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is not
necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If your print
cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the first time, but may
refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and ages. Using
remanufacturered and off-brand cartridges is also chancy. They may leak
causing print head damage. If your printer is old or you only paid $30
for it, the cost savings may be worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for
your printer, you may want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the
manufacturer.
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid points. I
may not necessarily agree with your position, but that's not a problem
for me. If you would continue with these kinds of replies and discontinue
the abusive behavior you might actually get a few people to respond to
you in a positive way.
--
Ron
DANK U
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote the
response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of your
statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an AARP
newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its entirety with no
credit given to the author. That is known as plagiarism and copyright
infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron
I just returned from six weeks out of town and see that MK (I have him
killfiled, but see parts of his misinformation in other participants' posts)
is still up to his old, old nonsense. I emphasize OLD - I had always
assumed that he was a juvenile deliquent, especially because part of his
attacks on me referenced my senior status. I now see that he reads AARP
material, and I have to revise my opinion of him - he must be the most
immature, profanity-obscessed, obnoxious, attention-seeking resident in an
old folks home. I should have known as his writing style, poor spelling and
syntax, smack of advanced dementia. Pity the other residents who have to
confront him daily. At least we can killfile him.
Good one Burt...and welcome back! |
Frank |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:57 am Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
Burt wrote:
| Quote: | "drc023" <d+r+c+0+2+3@sbcXXXglobalYYY.ZZZnet> wrote in message
news:8gkaf.9346$7h7.1565@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:fljaf.12009$dO2.437@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
drc023 wrote:
While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is not
necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If your print
cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the first time, but may
refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and ages. Using
remanufacturered and off-brand cartridges is also chancy. They may leak
causing print head damage. If your printer is old or you only paid $30
for it, the cost savings may be worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for
your printer, you may want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the
manufacturer.
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid points. I
may not necessarily agree with your position, but that's not a problem
for me. If you would continue with these kinds of replies and discontinue
the abusive behavior you might actually get a few people to respond to
you in a positive way.
--
Ron
DANK U
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote the
response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of your
statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an AARP
newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its entirety with no
credit given to the author. That is known as plagiarism and copyright
infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron
I just returned from six weeks out of town and see that MK
GOOD |
| Quote: | (I have him
killfiled, but see parts of his misinformation in other participants' posts)
is still up to his old, old nonsense. I emphasize OLD - I had always
assumed that he was a juvenile deliquent, especially because part of his
attacks on me referenced my senior status. I now see that he reads AARP
material, and I have to revise my opinion of him - he must be the most
immature, profanity-obscessed, obnoxious, attention-seeking resident in an
old folks home. I should have known as his writing style, poor spelling and
syntax, smack of advanced dementia. Pity the other residents who have to
confront him daily. At least we can killfile him.
DAT CAN NEVER HAPPEN SINCE DA MESSAGE THAT GENERIC INKS AREL |
POLY WOLLY CLOGGY GETS OUT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
measekite
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:58 am Post subject:
Re: Ink in Canada |
|
|
Frank wrote:
| Quote: | Burt wrote:
"drc023" <d+r+c+0+2+3@sbcXXXglobalYYY.ZZZnet> wrote in message
news:8gkaf.9346$7h7.1565@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:fljaf.12009$dO2.437@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
drc023 wrote:
While refilling ink cartridges yourself is the cheapest, it is
not necessarily the best way to go. Refilling can be messy. If
your print cartridge has a chip in it, the refill may work the
first time, but may refuse to work as the cartridge is reused and
ages. Using remanufacturered and off-brand cartridges is also
chancy. They may leak causing print head damage. If your printer
is old or you only paid $30 for it, the cost savings may be
worthwhile. If you paid $150 or more for your printer, you may
want to stick to purchasing cartridges from the manufacturer.
That's a pretty decent response. You actually make some valid
points. I may not necessarily agree with your position, but that's
not a problem for me. If you would continue with these kinds of
replies and discontinue the abusive behavior you might actually
get a few people to respond to you in a positive way.
--
Ron
DANK U
I assume that the baby talk means Thank You. Unfortunately I wrote
the response prior to doing any fact checking about the origin of
your statement. A quick Google search brought up the article from an
AARP newsletter where you copied the eighth paragraph in its
entirety with no credit given to the author. That is known as
plagiarism and copyright infringement. Here's a link to the article.
http://www.aarp.org/learntech/computers/life_online/costly_ink_cartridges.html
--
Ron
I just returned from six weeks out of town and see that MK (I have
him killfiled, but see parts of his misinformation in other
participants' posts) is still up to his old, old nonsense. I
emphasize OLD - I had always assumed that he was a juvenile
deliquent, especially because part of his attacks on me referenced my
senior status. I now see that he reads AARP material, and I have to
revise my opinion of him - he must be the most immature,
profanity-obscessed, obnoxious, attention-seeking resident in an old
folks home. I should have known as his writing style, poor spelling
and syntax, smack of advanced dementia. Pity the other residents who
have to confront him daily. At least we can killfile him.
Good one Burt...and welcome back!
Frank
|
MA AND PA KETTLE ADVOCATES OEM INK EXCEPT FOR LEXMARK. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in