A Day Without Smh ...

PC Hardware
Dicussion of PC hardware and peripherals

FAQ

Memberlist

Profile

A Day Without Smh ... Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

PC Hardware Forum Index -> CDR

Author

Message

smh
Guest

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 7:23 pm Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Noik wrote:

Quote:

The diatribes are generally 100% diatribe of no value.

(You know what a TOC is, don't you?)

Is this a diatribe?

======================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Date: 9/21/04

Howard Kaikow wrote:

Quote:

There is nothing wrong with packet writing itself, rather the
problem has been the poorly designed/implemented, and less
than adequately tested, implementations of ISO/IEC 13346.

The problem in fact lies with the error rate of CD media in general
and the specific problems of erasable media.

The impact comes in the TOC,
which must at least in part be scrubbed - erased and rewritten -
whenever a file is written or erased.

--------------------------------
Wow! What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------------

Because of the limited number of erase cycles the medium will
tolerate, fixed-length packets are implemented by holding
the TOC in RAM.

Since it is in RAM, it's subject to scrambling with a power
transient or OS crash.
======================

-------------------------
What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Paul Heslop
Guest

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 10:24 pm Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

smh wrote:

Quote:

. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Paul Heslop (Dumbhead) croaked:

smh wrote:

Paul Heslop (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

...all this crap...

Are these only crap, not libel?

Hw would I know, I'm not he. It doesn't impress though, mate, surely
you have better ways to waste your time? You're helpful, in general,
so why bug people with this garbage?

Am I putting a gun to your head to force you to read my posts?

BTW, you're pretty much wasting your time with me, been there, done
that, read the t-shirt.

Why then all these hysteria?

Again, are these only crap, not libel?

Let's ask two people, well, a people and a publisher... Mike, who I'm
sure has become wary of even trying to talk to you, and good old
Oxford

libel

• noun 1 Law the publication of a false statement that is damaging
to a person’s reputation. Compare with SLANDER. 2 a written
defamation.

• verb (libelled, libelling; US libelled, libelling) Law defame by
publishing a libel.

— DERIVATIVES libellous (US also libellous) adjective.

now, I don't know Mike and I'm a relative newbie here, so I don't
really know you. All I see is endless streams of this CRAP from you.
If it IS libel then it's Mike's place to take that up with you. What
is is a waste of bandwidth and a bore.

--
Paul (Demanding Billy Dolls, And other friends of mine)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Mike Richter
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:33 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

Paul Heslop wrote:

Quote:

Let's ask two people, well, a people and a publisher... Mike, who I'm
sure has become wary of even trying to talk to you, and good old
Oxford

I stopped trying to talk to it years ago. (As some feel comparison with
excrement is unfair to excrement, I feel that neither the male nor the
female sex should be presumed. If there were an expert on trolls around,
I'd try to find out whether they are asexual as well as subhuman.)

I trust that those with judgement have stopped reading it as I have. I
find the illness pitiable, but not actionable.

I do wish people would not quote its babble as though it were
meaningful. When I see that in a reply, I move on.

Mike
--
mrichter@cpl.net
http://www.mrichter.com/

Jesse
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 3:24 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

Noik wrote in news:i3itq0lqn43le5och10k5j79squ5adp18e@4ax.com:

Quote:

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:47:09 GMT, Jesse <org@org.orgy> wrote:

Is like a day without pig shit.

His S/N ratio sucks. But his S is strong, he offers more useful
advice than anybody else.

Your right - I'll give the guy props.
If your inclined to sort through his BS, he is obviously a knowlegable person
when it comes to CD/R topics.
The sensible thing for him to do would be to retire this neurotic fictional
character he has created, and establish a new identity as a functional member
of the usenet.
Easier said than done I suppose, as this smh character is likely a reflection
of his real personality, or at least how he wants it to be.
He obviously feeds off of the reputation hes laborously built over the years
of being a complete ass and usenet whacko - And would likely suffer negative
consequences in real life if he had to do without this release.

Ok, I'm done playing usenet psychiatrist,

mirror
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 3:39 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:24:12 GMT, Jesse <org@org.orgy> wrote:

Quote:

His S/N ratio sucks. But his S is strong, he offers more useful
advice than anybody else.

Your right - I'll give the guy props.

I'd like to see smh lay out the cause of the beef with Mike
Richter, suggest a resolution, then maybe put it all down. I give
smh props for knowledge. smh, where do you want to go with this
(other than Mike Richter at Guantanamo Bay?).

smh
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:39 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Paul Heslop (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Quote:

smh wrote:

Paul Heslop (Dumbhead) croaked:

why bug people with this garbage?

Am I putting a gun to your head to force you to read my posts?

BTW, you're pretty much wasting your time with me, been there, done
that, read the t-shirt.

Why then all these hysteria?

Again, are these only crap, not libel?

Let's ask two people, well, a people and a publisher... Mike, who I'm
sure has become wary of even trying to talk to you, and good old
Oxford

Here's a Mikey's answer:

=======================
From: Mike Richter
Subject: Re: Mike Richter is a LIAR
Date: 2/23/04

I have not commented on the troll's posts for some years now
I only know what it posts when it falls out when replying to someone

who quotes the slanders and lies as you did.
=======================

Quote:

now, I don't know Mike and I'm a relative newbie here, so I don't
really know you. All I see is endless streams of this CRAP from you.

You don't know, yet you know!

Quote:

If it IS libel then it's Mike's place to take that up with you.
is is a waste of bandwidth and a bore.

Am I putting a gun to your head to force you to read my posts?

=========================================
From: Mike Richter
Subject: Re: Mike Richter is a LIAR
Date: 9/4/03

Vastly Doggerel wrote:

Quote:

"smh" wrote:

"Mike Richter is a LIAR"

Is this true? If so, these are pretty strong claims to make.
Why has Mike Richter not offered rebuttals?

No, it is not true that I am a liar. It is true that
a particular troll, whose egesta I do not consume,

misquotes me and misrepresents me.

I know that from its quotation by others.
=========================================

Wonder why this:

No Pipsqueaks have been able to prove ANY of these is a LIBEL
-- despite Mikey claimed to have proof of misquotes !!

Mike Richter is a LIAR (wife beating)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (critical bugs)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (major bug)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (nda limit)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (nda)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (no secret)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (no secret)(ii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (dae)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (enhanced-cd)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (no enhanced cd)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (enhanced-cd/cdr-faq)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (cd-extra/cd-text)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (cd-extra/sao/tao)(i)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (cd-extra/single-session)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/winme)(i)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/winme)(ii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(i)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(ii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(iii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(iv)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/plextor)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(i)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(ii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(iii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(iv)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(v)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(vi)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(vii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(8a)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(9a)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (i)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (ii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (iii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (iv)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (v)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (vi)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (vii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (viii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (ix)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (x)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (xi)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (xii)
Mike Richter is a LIAR (supplied cd)
What's wrong with Mike Richter (Tim Kroesen) (i)
What's wrong with Mike Richter (Tim Kroesen) (ii)
Mike Richter Wow! Wow! Wow!
Mike Richter's Exquisite Sense of Time (i)
Mike Richter's Exquisite Sense of Time (ii)
Mike Richter's Exquisite Sense of Time (iii)
Mike Richter & "Looooooooonng" Time for Nothing

What an Asshole

smh
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:43 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB) spewed:

Quote:

I stopped trying to talk to it years ago.
I trust that those with judgement have stopped reading it as I have.

I do wish people would not quote its babble as though it were
meaningful. When I see that in a reply, I move on.

===================================
From: Mike Richter
Subject: Re: Mike Richter is a LIAR
Date: 9/4/03

Vastly Doggerel wrote:

Quote:

"smh" wrote:

"Mike Richter is a LIAR"

Is this true? If so, these are pretty strong claims to make.
Why has Mike Richter not offered rebuttals?

No, it is not true that I am a liar. It is true that
a particular troll, whose egesta I do not consume,
misquotes me and misrepresents me.

I know that from its quotation by others.
=========================================

=======================
From: Mike Richter
Subject: Re: Mike Richter is a LIAR
Date: 2/23/04

I have not commented on the troll's posts for some years now
I only know what it posts when it falls out when replying to someone

who quotes the slanders and lies as you did.
=======================

================================
From: smh
Date: 5/28/03

Mike Richter (Lying Scum) wrote:

Quote:

smh wrote:
snip

snip

Responding to my post, Mikey?

Couldn't resist the opportunity to pan InCD, even at the expense of
going back on your own words, Mikey?
====================================

Paul Heslop
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:17 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

Mike Richter wrote:

Quote:

Paul Heslop wrote:

Let's ask two people, well, a people and a publisher... Mike, who I'm
sure has become wary of even trying to talk to you, and good old
Oxford

I stopped trying to talk to it years ago. (As some feel comparison with
excrement is unfair to excrement, I feel that neither the male nor the
female sex should be presumed. If there were an expert on trolls around,
I'd try to find out whether they are asexual as well as subhuman.)

I trust that those with judgement have stopped reading it as I have. I
find the illness pitiable, but not actionable.

I do wish people would not quote its babble as though it were
meaningful. When I see that in a reply, I move on.

Mike
--
mrichter@cpl.net
http://www.mrichter.com/

that's understandable. I often forget to trim crap from posts, some
groups if you did that you'd be trimming crap all day
--
Paul (Demanding Billy Dolls, And other friends of mine)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Paul Heslop
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:18 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

smh wrote: Oh piss off -- Paul (Demanding Billy Dolls, And other friends of mine) ------------------------------------------------------ Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

smh
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:39 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Paul Heslop (Stupid Fuck) squeaked:

Quote:

Oh piss off

Am I putting a gun to your head to read my posts, Stupid Fuck?

Don't you have judgement, Stupid Fuck?

Mikey:
"I trust that those with judgement
have stopped reading it as I have."

=============================
From: smh
Date: 5/28/03

Mike Richter (Lying Scum) wrote:

Quote:

smh wrote:
snip

snip

Responding to my post, Mikey?
=============================

smh
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 8:26 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

mirror (Dumb Fuck) squealed:

Quote:

This Dumb Fuck does not even realize when being toyed with and being
insulted!!

======================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Date: 9/21/04

Howard Kaikow wrote:

Quote:

There is nothing wrong with packet writing itself, rather the
problem has been the poorly designed/implemented, and less
than adequately tested, implementations of ISO/IEC 13346.

Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 4:10 pm Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:23:11 -0700, smh <smhong@mindspring.com> wrote:

Quote:

. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Noik wrote:

The diatribes are generally 100% diatribe of no value.

(You know what a TOC is, don't you?)

I know what the acronym stands for, but no, I mostly don't know what
it means. I think it might be similar to the DOS FAT, but I don't
really know anything about how stuff is organized on a CD. Is the TOC
rewritten every time something is added to a CD-RW being used in
DirectCD type mode?

Quote:

Is this a diatribe?

Basically, yes. The "Slimy Friggin SOB" bit kinda gives it away. ;-)
I'm aware that Mike's answer of "Since it is in RAM" didn't account for
the problems someone was having, and I certainly have no problem with
errors being pointed out. But I'm having a hard time figuring out why
you think its approporiate to have a little rant for yourself at every
opportunity. What are you trying to accomplish? You mostly just get
tuned out, so you're not really accomplishing anything. Folks who
might actually be interested in your issues with Mike don't pay
attention because of the kooky way you go about presenting them. I
think you'd be much better off with something like the "Issue of the
week" where you post something Mike has said, and take issue with it
with a point by point refutation. People would be more apt pay
attention with the much improved S/N ratio, and you might have better
luck getting your point across.

N

Quote:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Date: 9/21/04

Howard Kaikow wrote:

There is nothing wrong with packet writing itself, rather the
problem has been the poorly designed/implemented, and less
than adequately tested, implementations of ISO/IEC 13346.

The problem in fact lies with the error rate of CD media in general
and the specific problems of erasable media.

The impact comes in the TOC,
which must at least in part be scrubbed - erased and rewritten -
whenever a file is written or erased.

--------------------------------
Wow! What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------------

Because of the limited number of erase cycles the medium will
tolerate, fixed-length packets are implemented by holding
the TOC in RAM.

Since it is in RAM, it's subject to scrambling with a power
transient or OS crash.
======================

-------------------------
What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

--
N

smh
Guest

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:33 pm Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Noik wrote:

Quote:

smh wrote:
Noik wrote:

The diatribes are generally 100% diatribe of no value.

(You know what a TOC is, don't you?)

I know what the acronym stands for, but no, I mostly don't know what
it means. I think it might be similar to the DOS FAT, but I don't
really know anything about how stuff is organized on a CD.

TOC gives the start positions of the tracks on a cd. You may think of
TOC as a table of content of *tracks*. TOC is in the lead-in, preceding
the program/data area where a file system resides. TOC is not the (file
system) directory. TOC absolutely has nothing to do with a (file
system) directory.

Quote:

Is the TOC
rewritten every time something is added to a CD-RW being used in
DirectCD type mode?

Doesn't it now clear to you that if anything is rewritten, it's not the
TOC?

Quote:

Is this a diatribe?

Basically, yes. The "Slimy Friggin SOB" bit kinda gives it away. ;-)

You see, if you know what a TOC is, then you know what Mikey spewed
about the TOC being rewritten when files change is an absolute,
unadulterated, cockamamie drivel. It deserves only a "diatribe"
response.

Actually the friggin slimeball is perpetrating a scam on the group with
the use of "TOC", knowing many would assume it synonymous with
directory, but then not quite sure of that as true, though. Many thus
wonder if there's more to it than being merely synonymous. By injecting
the uncertainty and ambiguity, the friggin slimeball is slimily trying
to weasel out of this:

Does DirectCD formatted CD-R have a directory?
If so, does the directory get scrubbed?
(like formatted CD-RW is supposed to be scrubbed)

Quote:

I'm aware that Mike's answer of "Since it is in RAM" didn't account for
the problems someone was having, and I certainly have no problem with
errors being pointed out. But I'm having a hard time figuring out why
you think its approporiate to have a little rant for yourself at every
opportunity. What are you trying to accomplish? You mostly just get
tuned out, so you're not really accomplishing anything. Folks who
might actually be interested in your issues with Mike don't pay
attention because of the kooky way you go about presenting them. I
think you'd be much better off with something like the "Issue of the
week" where you post something Mike has said, and take issue with it
with a point by point refutation. People would be more apt pay
attention with the much improved S/N ratio, and you might have better
luck getting your point across.

Long, long time ago, when I didn't know the friggin slimeball any
better, I tried a "civil" approach. It didn't work. If the friggin
slimeball has one iota of redeemable value, I wouldn't be doing what I
am doing now. And people like you are few and far in between. The
trashes in this thread are the norm. Nothing will change these trashes.

Quote:

Jesse
Guest

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 2:56 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

smh <smhong@mindspring.com> wrote in news:41B0A359.B13FEDAD@mindspring.com:

Quote:

. --------------------------------------
SMH, were you born with
"DillRod" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Noik wrote:
smh wrote:
Noik wrote:

The diatribes are generally 100% diatribe of no value.

(You know what a TOC is, don't you?)

I know what the acronym stands for, but no, I mostly don't know what
it means. I think it might be similar to the DOS FAT, but I don't
really know anything about how stuff is organized on a CD.

TOC gives the start positions of the tracks on a cd. You may think of
TOC as a table of content of *tracks*. TOC is in the lead-in, preceding
the program/data area where a file system resides. TOC is not the (file
system) directory. TOC absolutely has nothing to do with a (file
system) directory.

**FLASH**

A moment of lucidity for smh - And he proves once and for all that he/she can
compose an entire paragraph without referrence to animal/family sex.
Did your thorzine shipment come in, what ?

Neil Maxwell
Guest

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 6:04 am Post subject: Re: A Day Without Smh ...

On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:56:02 GMT, Jesse <org@org.orgy> wrote:

Quote:

**FLASH**
A moment of lucidity for smh - And he proves once and for all that he/she can
compose an entire paragraph without referrence to animal/family sex.
Did your thorzine shipment come in, what ?

That was, in fact, pretty astonishing. I had to pick that one for my
once-a-month check-to-see-if-he's-changed post, and was shocked enough
to read a few others that are, alas, the usual noise.

There was only one little snip of canned diatribe, and that's as good
as none by SMH's standards.

--
Neil Maxwell - I don't speak for my employer

	PC Hardware Forum Index -> CDR	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 2 of 3

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Electronics VoIP DSP
New Topics php BB